Tag Archives: fiduciary

What Employers Need to Know About the Fiduciary Conflict Rule

Our colleague Jason Levy recently published an article in The Actuary Magazine on the Department of Labor’s fiduciary conflict rule.  More than six years in the making, this rule represents perhaps the most significant regulation from the DOL during the Obama Administration. The fiduciary conflict rule expands the definition of fiduciary to cover, with certain … Continue Reading

Supreme Court Reiterates High Pleading Bar for Stock Drop Cases

As noted in our earlier blog post, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 decision Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer made clear that participants bringing stock-drop cases are subject to heightened pleading standards to help “divide the plausible sheep from the meritless goats.” In its first substantive ruling in a post-Dudenhoeffer stock-drop case, the U.S. Supreme Court … Continue Reading

ERISA Liability Insurance: Know What’s Covered . . . And What Isn’t

For sponsors and fiduciaries of employee benefit plans, the Amara case has presented many interesting and important issues that have been discussed at length in this blog and elsewhere. However, the most recent chapter in this long-running dispute has not garnered nearly as much attention as either the Supreme Court or Second Circuit decisions that … Continue Reading

Stock-Drop Decision Helpful to ESOP Fiduciaries

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in the stock-drop case, Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer.  The Court vacated the lower court decision that was adverse to the employer, Fifth Third Bancorp, and remanded the case to the lower courts for further proceedings. Fiduciaries of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) had hoped that … Continue Reading

Judges Disagree on Remedies for Pension Mistake

A recent Ninth Circuit decision, Gabriel v. Alaska Elec. Pension Fund, offers useful insight for deciding how to fix a pension overpayment. Virtually every employer that administers a pension plan has experienced (or will experience) discovering a calculation error after incorrect payments have been made for several years–resulting in thousands of dollars of overpayments.  Fixing … Continue Reading

Fiduciaries May Be Responsible for Call Center Statements to Fill in Gaps in SPD

A recent Seventh Circuit case, Killian v. Concert Health Plan (Nov. 7, 2013), highlights two important principles for any plan sponsor or fiduciary: If a plan document or summary plan description leaves out information and says to call a phone number for details, plan fiduciaries can be responsible for call center representatives’ oral statements and … Continue Reading
LexBlog